Introduction & Theoretical Background
Distancing and decentering
While these terms are sometimes used interchangeably in the CBT literature, most likely due to their conceptual overlap (e.g., Bernstein et al., 2015; Leahy, 2017), there are important distinctions:
Distancing is an active, regulatory, metacognitive process that involves viewing cognitions as “constructions of ‘reality’ rather than reality itself” (Alford & Beck, 1997, p. 142; Ingram & Hollon, 1986). In other words, it means recognizing that one’s thoughts are subjective interpretations or hypotheses (Hollon & Beck, 1979), resulting in a “distinction between ‘I believe’ (an opinion that is subject to validation) and ‘I know’ (an ‘irrefutable’ fact)” (Beck, 1976, p.243).
Decentering is the ability to step outside one’s immediate experience and view it from other perspectives, allowing appraisals to be re-evaluated (Beck, 1999; Wills, 2020). In other words, decentering encourages individuals to view their thoughts as ideas that they can test (Harvey et al., 2004).
Thus, distancing appears to be a prerequisite